| Question: Is
                      Buddhism scientific?Answer: Before we answer that question it would be best to define
the word 'science.' Science, according to the dictionary, is - "knowledge which
can be made into a system, which depends upon seeing and testing facts and stating
general natural laws, a branch of such knowledge, anything that can be studied
exactly."
    There are aspects of Buddhism that would
                not fit into this definition but the central teachings of Buddhism,
                the Four Noble Truths (四聖諦),
              most certainly would. Suffering, the First Noble Truth (苦諦), is
              an experience that can be defined, experienced and measured. The
              Second Noble Truth (集諦) states that suffering has a natural cause,
              craving, which likewise can be defined, experienced and measured.
              No attempt is made to explain suffering in terms of a metaphysical
              concept or myths. Suffering is ended, according to the Third Noble
              Truth (滅諦), not by relying on upon a supreme being, by faith or
              by prayers but simply by removing its cause. This is axiomatic.
              The Fourth Noble Truth (道諦), the way to end suffering, once again,
              has nothing to do with metaphysics but depends on behaving in specific
              ways. And once again behavior is open to testing. Buddhism dispenses
              with the concept of a supreme being, as does science, and explains
              the origins and workings of the universe in terms of natural laws.
              All of this certainly exhibits a scientific spirit. Once again,
              the Buddha's constant advice that we should not blindly believe
              but rather question, examine, inquire and rely on our own experience,
              has a definite scientific ring to it. In his famous Kalama Sutta,
            the Buddha says: 
              "Do not go by revelation or tradition, do
                    not go by rumor or the sacred scriptures, do not go by hearsay
                    or
                    mere logic, do not go by bias towards a notion or by another
                    person's
                  seeming ability and do not go by the idea 'He is our teacher'. But when you yourself know that a thing
                    is good, that it is not blamable, that it is praised by the
                    wise and when
                    practised and
                    observed that it leads to happiness, then follow that thing."    So
                    we could say that although Buddhism in not entirely scientific,
                    it certainly has a strong scientific overtone and is certainly
                    more scientific than any other religion. It is significant
                    that Albert Einstein, the greatest scientist of the 20th
                century said
                  of Buddhism: 
              "The religion of the future will be a cosmic
                          religion. It should transcend a personal God and avoid
                    dogmas and theology.
                          Covering both the natural and spiritual, it should
                    be based on a religious sense arising from the experience
                    of all things,
                          natural and spiritual and a meaningful unity. Buddhism
                    answers this description.
                          If there is any religion that would cope with modern
                    scientific needs, it would be Buddhism." |